RatedWithAI
Accessibility scanner
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies — and any organization that receives federal funding or builds technology for the government — to make their information and communications technology (ICT) accessible to people with disabilities. With 9,900+ monthly searches for "section 508 compliance" and the April 24, 2026 ADA Title II deadline amplifying urgency, understanding these requirements has never been more critical.
Section 508 is part of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, a landmark civil rights law that prohibits discrimination based on disability in programs conducted by federal agencies and in programs receiving federal financial assistance. Specifically, Section 508 addresses electronic and information technology (EIT) — now referred to as information and communications technology (ICT).
The law was first added as an amendment in 1986, but it wasn't until the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 that Section 508 gained real enforcement teeth. The 1998 amendment required federal agencies to make their electronic and information technology accessible to people with disabilities — both employees and members of the public.
In January 2017, the U.S. Access Board published a major update to Section 508— commonly called the "508 Refresh." This was the first significant update in nearly 20 years, and it fundamentally changed how compliance is measured by incorporating the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) as the technical standard.
Key changes in the 2017 refresh:
Section 508 applies to a broader range of organizations than most people realize. If your organization has any connection to the federal government, you likely have Section 508 obligations.
All executive branch agencies, independent regulatory agencies, the Postal Service, and the Postal Rate Commission. All ICT they develop, procure, maintain, or use must be accessible.
Any company that builds, sells, or maintains ICT products for the federal government. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requires Section 508 compliance in contracts.
State agencies, universities, non-profits, and other organizations that receive federal grants, loans, or other financial assistance. This extends Section 504 protections to their digital assets.
While Section 508 is technically federal-only, Section 504 of the same law requires any program receiving federal money to be accessible. Most state/local governments receive some federal funding.
DoD contracts increasingly require Section 508 compliance. The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) has specific accessibility testing requirements for all delivered systems.
Hospitals and health systems receiving Medicare/Medicaid funding (i.e., virtually all of them) have Section 504 obligations that mirror Section 508 requirements.
Even if your organization isn't a federal agency, the "federal nexus" can bring you under Section 508's umbrella. If you receive federal grants (research universities, state Medicaid programs, transportation agencies), bid on federal contracts (SaaS vendors, IT consultancies), or participate in federally funded programs, your ICT must meet Section 508 standards. In practice, this covers tens of thousands of organizations beyond the federal government itself.
These three standards are often confused, but they serve different purposes, apply to different organizations, and have different technical requirements. Understanding the differences — and overlaps — is essential for compliance planning.
The critical distinction: Section 508 currently references WCAG 2.0 Level AA, while the new ADA Title II rule references WCAG 2.1 Level AA. WCAG 2.1 adds 17 new success criteria beyond WCAG 2.0, primarily addressing mobile accessibility, low vision, and cognitive disabilities. If your organization falls under both Section 508 and ADA Title II, you should target WCAG 2.1 AA to satisfy both.
Section 508 covers four main categories of ICT. Here's a comprehensive checklist organized by category:
Effective Section 508 testing combines automated scanning, manual evaluation, and assistive technology testing. No single approach catches everything — you need all three.
Automated tools can detect approximately 30-40% of WCAG violationsinstantly. They're the best starting point because they can scan hundreds of pages in minutes and identify the most common issues like missing alt text, contrast failures, and missing form labels.
RatedWithAI scans your website against WCAG 2.0 AA (Section 508) and WCAG 2.1 AA (ADA Title II) standards simultaneously. Get a compliance score, violation counts, and prioritized fix recommendations in seconds.
Manual testing catches the other 60-70% of issues that automated tools miss. Focus on:
The DHS Trusted Tester process recommends testing with actual screen readers and assistive technologies:
Free, open-source screen reader. The most popular testing tool for Section 508 evaluations. Used in the DHS Trusted Tester process.
Industry-standard commercial screen reader. Most widely used by blind computer users. Essential for enterprise testing.
Built into Apple devices. Critical for testing iOS and macOS applications. No additional cost.
Built into Android devices. Required for testing Android applications.
Voice recognition software. Tests voice-only navigation for users with motor disabilities.
For federal procurement, you'll need a Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT). The VPAT is a standardized document that describes how your product conforms to Section 508 standards. There are four editions:
Download VPAT templates and learn how to complete them →
While Section 508 has been in effect since 2001 (with the 2017 refresh effective January 2018), the upcoming April 24, 2026 ADA Title II deadline creates new urgency for many organizations that overlap both laws.
Here's why the deadline matters for Section 508-covered organizations:
Must comply with both Section 508 (via Section 504) AND the new ADA Title II WCAG 2.1 AA requirement. The ADA rule is stricter — WCAG 2.1 has 17 more criteria than WCAG 2.0.
Federal research grants trigger Section 508. State funding triggers ADA Title II. Both now apply, and the higher standard (WCAG 2.1 AA) effectively becomes the floor.
Your government clients now face the April 2026 deadline. If your product isn't WCAG 2.1 AA compliant, they can't use it. This is a contract risk.
Medicare/Medicaid funding triggers Section 504/508. Hospital websites serving 50K+ populations also face ADA Title II. Double exposure requires the higher standard.
Bottom line: If your organization is subject to Section 508, you should already be targeting WCAG 2.1 Level AA — not just WCAG 2.0 — to future-proof compliance. The regulatory landscape is converging on 2.1 as the minimum standard.
Read our full ADA Title II deadline countdown guide →
Based on data from the DHS Section 508 program office, GSA's IT Accessibility program, and WebAIM's 2026 Million Report, these are the most frequently cited violations — and their fixes:
Fix: Add descriptive alt text to all meaningful images. Use alt="" for purely decorative images. For complex images (charts, diagrams), provide a long description via aria-describedby or a linked text alternative.
Fix: Ensure text has at least 4.5:1 contrast ratio against its background. Large text (18pt or 14pt bold) needs 3:1. Use a contrast checker tool. Don't rely on color alone to convey information.
Fix: Associate every form input with a label using the for/id pattern: <label for="email">Email</label><input id="email">. For visually hidden labels, use the sr-only CSS class pattern. Never use placeholder text as the only label.
Fix: Ensure users can navigate into and out of every component using only the keyboard. Modal dialogs must trap focus inside while open but release it on close. Test by tabbing through the entire page without using a mouse.
Fix: Add lang attribute to the HTML element: <html lang="en">. For content in a different language, use the lang attribute on the containing element: <span lang="es">Hola mundo</span>.
Fix: Replace 'click here', 'read more', and 'learn more' with descriptive text: 'Read our accessibility compliance guide'. If a link wraps an image, the image's alt text serves as the link text.
Fix: Tag PDFs with proper heading structure, reading order, alt text, and table headers. Use Adobe Acrobat's accessibility checker. Better yet: publish content as HTML instead of PDF wherever possible.
Fix: Add synchronized captions to all prerecorded video with audio. Auto-generated captions must be reviewed and corrected for accuracy. Live events need real-time captioning services.
See our detailed guide to fixing common WCAG failures →
Section 508 enforcement has historically been weaker than ADA Title III enforcement, but that's changing rapidly. Here are the mechanisms that can hold organizations accountable:
Federal employees and members of the public can file complaints with any federal agency. The agency must investigate and resolve. Since 2023, the DOJ has been more aggressive in tracking complaint resolution.
Federal procurement officers can reject products without adequate VPATs, cancel contracts for non-compliance, or require remediation at the vendor's expense. The GSA's Buy Accessible program actively enforces this.
While Section 508 itself doesn't create a private right of action, Section 504 does. Organizations receiving federal funding can be sued under Section 504 for inaccessible ICT. This is how most enforcement actually happens.
The DOJ can investigate and sue federal agencies and federally-funded organizations. Recent settlements have included multi-million dollar remediation requirements and ongoing monitoring.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) periodically audits federal agency compliance. Findings are public and can lead to budget impacts.
Our free scanner tests your website against WCAG 2.0 AA (Section 508) and WCAG 2.1 AA (ADA Title II) simultaneously. Get your compliance score in under 60 seconds.