RatedWithAI

RatedWithAI

Accessibility scanner

ADA compliance snapshot

Is Social Security Administration Accessible?

We ran axe-core against the Social Security Administration homepage and scored the WCAG 2.1 failures it reported. Everything below is what that automated scan actually found — no estimates.

SSA.gov provides access to Social Security benefits, disability applications, retirement planning tools, and Medicare enrollment for millions of Americans.

https://www.ssa.govGovernment

Accessibility score

F
56

Grade F from 6 axe-core violations and 43 passed checks

Scanned September 1, 2026 — homepage only, automated axe-core check

What the scan found

The axe-core rules that failed on the Social Security Administration homepage, most impactful first.

  • Images must have alternate text

    image-alt · critical impact · 1 element

  • Elements must meet minimum color contrast ratio thresholds

    color-contrast · serious impact · 4 elements

  • Heading levels should only increase by one

    heading-order · moderate impact · 3 elements

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks

    region · moderate impact · 2 elements

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination

    landmark-unique · moderate impact · 1 element

  • Page should contain a level-one heading

    page-has-heading-one · moderate impact · 1 element

Scanned September 1, 2026 against https://www.ssa.gov. 3 checks needed manual review and are not counted in the score.

What this scan does not cover

Automated checks like this one catch roughly 30–40% of WCAG issues, and this scan covers the homepage only. Manual testing is still required for keyboard flows, screen reader output and content quality.

A clean automated score is a floor, not a pass. If you need the issues an automated homepage check misses, run a full scan on your own site and work through the findings.

Run a free scan on your site

Why Accessibility Matters for Social Security Administration

Social Security serves a disproportionately high number of users with disabilities. Inaccessible benefit applications, disability claim forms, and account management tools directly harm the most vulnerable populations.

What this means

Each failure above is a concrete barrier an automated tool could see without a human in the loop. This is not legal advice, but ADA complaints routinely cite exactly these WCAG 2.1 AA failures — contrast, labels, landmarks and keyboard access.

Business impact

Missed conversions from users who rely on assistive technology, plus higher support costs from inaccessible flows.

Compliance impact

ADA lawsuits often cite WCAG failures like contrast, labels, and keyboard access. Addressing the top issues closes the biggest gaps.

Related resources

Keep exploring accessibility benchmarks and WCAG success criteria.

Fix accessibility issues

Use these free tools and guides to fix the accessibility issues found above:

Check your own site

Run a free ADA + WCAG scan in seconds

Start a free scan

Free covers 5 scans a month. Need the site watched instead of checked once? Starter is $29/mo for continuous monitoring, audit trails and PDF/CSV exports.