RatedWithAI

RatedWithAI

Accessibility scanner

Tool Comparison

RatedWithAI vs AudioEye: Which Accessibility Solution Actually Works?

AudioEye is a publicly traded accessibility company ($AEYE) offering a hybrid approach: automated scanning plus overlay remediation. RatedWithAI takes a fundamentally different path — transparent scanning that helps you fix issues at the source. Here's how they compare.

The Core Difference

AudioEye uses a "hybrid" model: they scan your site for issues, then apply automated JavaScript fixes as an overlay. They also offer human auditing as an add-on. Their philosophy is "fix it for you" — they patch issues client-side rather than requiring code changes.

RatedWithAI scans your site using the axe-core engine and presents a clear, actionable report. You see every violation, understand why it matters, and fix it in your actual code. No overlay, no JavaScript patches — permanent, real fixes.

Pricing Comparison

RatedWithAI

$29/month

  • ✓ Unlimited axe-core scans
  • ✓ Real violation reports
  • ✓ Brand accessibility monitoring
  • ✓ WCAG criterion-level detail
  • ✓ Cancel anytime

= $348/year

AudioEye

$199+/month

  • • Automated scanning + overlay fixes
  • • JavaScript-based remediation
  • • Compliance reporting
  • • Human audit available (enterprise)
  • • Annual contracts common

= $2,388+/year

RatedWithAI is ~7x cheaper than AudioEye. The question is whether AudioEye's overlay remediation justifies the premium — or whether fixing issues at the source is the better investment.

Feature Comparison

FeatureRatedWithAIAudioEye
Automated scanning✓ axe-core✓ Proprietary
Fixes issues in source code✓ Reports to fix✗ Overlay patches
No JavaScript dependency
Human auditing✓ (enterprise add-on)
Legal liability protectionVia real complianceVia overlay + audit
Free tier / trial✓ Free scan✓ Free scan
Continuous monitoring
Monthly pricing available✓ $29/mo✓ $199+/mo
Brand/competitor monitoring
Open-source scanning engine✓ axe-core✗ Proprietary

The Overlay Question

AudioEye positions itself differently from accessiBe — they call their approach "hybrid" because it combines scanning with automated remediation. However, the core mechanism is similar: JavaScript modifications to the live page.

This raises the same fundamental concerns:

  • If the JavaScript fails to load, accessibility improvements disappear
  • Client-side patches can conflict with assistive technology
  • The underlying HTML remains non-compliant
  • You're paying ongoing fees for something that should be a permanent fix

AudioEye's counter-argument is that their human audit team reviews and tunes the automated fixes. This is genuinely better than a pure overlay approach — but at $199+/month, the cost is significant for small businesses.

Who Should Choose RatedWithAI?

  • Small businesses — $29/mo makes real accessibility affordable
  • Development teams — Actionable axe-core reports integrate into your workflow
  • Budget-conscious organizations — 7x cheaper with permanent fixes
  • Teams with some technical capability — Fix issues once, benefit forever
  • Transparency advocates — Open-source scanning engine, no black box

Who Might Prefer AudioEye?

  • Enterprise organizations — Budget for $199+/mo and value human auditing
  • Zero-resource teams — No developers available to fix issues
  • Publicly traded companies — May want the "audit + remediation" story for compliance documentation
  • Legacy system owners — Can't modify source code easily

Try real accessibility scanning

Get your website's accessibility score in 30 seconds. See real violations, understand WCAG criteria, and start fixing issues at the source.

Scan your site free — no overlay required

Related Comparisons